Friday, July 17, 2009

A Time For Uncomfortable Alliances

History provides many examples of philosophic enemies who joined forces to achieve a mutually desired purpose. Such an event occurred during World War II, when the American president and the communist leader of the Soviet Union came together to oppose Nazi Germany.

Both FDR and Joseph Stalin realized that the very survival of their nations may depend upon whether Hitler could be stopped. Their alliance represented a simple recognition that the consequences of noncooperation outweighed the sum of all other political, economic or philosophic considerations.

Such a time has now come for conservatives and libertarians.

The U.S. Constitution, and the government prescribed by it, was established to protect our inalienable rights. Those are the rights that preexisted government, such as the right of property ownership, self-defense, etc. Our Founders keenly realized that democracy is a poor guardian of individual liberty. They knew that if two wolves and a sheep vote what's for lunch, the individual rights of the sheep could be endangered. Therefore, a republic was established, where the law of the land--the Constitution--supersedes majority rule.

From the moment George Washington took his oath, federal politicians, unhappy with strict limitations on their authority, began searching for mechanisms to expand their power. The Civil War aside, these efforts were largely unsuccessful. That is, until the early 20th century, when the foundation for a powerful central government was put in place by the imposition of the federal income tax, establishment of the Federal Reserve and adoption of the 17th Amendment.

The process was then kicked into a higher gear by Franklin Roosevelt. Hard times helped boost his notion that it is government's proper function to take the rightful property of one person and simply give it to another. In effect, this paternalistic notion, an outgrowth of desperate times and fueled by class envy, was allowed to trump the founding principle of a limited government.

A couple of decades later, LBJ gave the big government knob another twist with his “War on Poverty,” the result of which has been to create massive bureaucracy, subsidize illegitimacy, make self-support a less attractive option and increase the appeal of dependence on the state. Rather than promote self-sufficiency, the incentives produced by these programs create a system where politicians are seen as all-knowing parents while citizens are treated as children.

Currently, America's inept political class has created a combined debt and unfunded liability (the amount needed to cover promises already made regarding Medicare, Social Security etc.) of more than $50 trillion, or about 15 times the federal government's annual revenue. At some point in time, every dime of this shortfall MUST be extracted from the lifestyle of American families. As political powerbrokers command more wealth, citizens command less. That means fewer choices and diminished liberty.

For more than two hundred years, our liberties---those choices we make regarding use of our minds, our bodies, our skills, our motivations and our energies---have been whittled down from their once powerful status. Now, the toxic mix of an ambitious Barack Obama, a big-spending democratic supermajority and a fawning media are applying power tools to the process. Each time central planners are ushered in the front door, another piece of liberty is swept out the back.

The same political nincompoops who have proven unable to regulate themselves, and have saddled future generations with crushing debt, are now seizing the power to command private industry. Consumer demand is slowly giving way to political dictates. Just this year, we have witnessed great institutions of banking, insurance and transportation swallowed up by the Washington oligarchy. Our health care and energy use are the latest targets for government takeover.

Now, another group is actively seeking power-enhancing mechanisms. This time, it is the American people, looking to regain control of their country and restore lost liberty. This is where the uncomfortable alliance part comes in. Just as an emergency room surgeon understands that the life-threatening crisis must addressed or concerns regarding the broken thumb become meaningless, Americans must first preserve their liberty so that other political concerns remain relevant.

Many issues separate conservatives and libertarians, some of which cannot easily be reconciled. But, survival dictates we put them aside. Foreign policy and the drug war are bones of contention between Rush Limbaugh and Ron Paul, but both agree on the virtues of the free enterprise system. Economists Peter Schiff and Art Laffer are hardly philosophic twins, but unite as outspoken critics of socialism. Mark Levin and Neil Boortz have plenty of disagreements, but sing from the same hymnal when it comes to Constitutional originalism.

Like FDR and Stalin, libertarians and conservatives cannot afford the luxury of divided energy. The forces of big government are simply too formidable for that. With the fully enlisted support of class envy, dependency and ignorance, they can only be defeated by a focused, intent opposition. Unless we voluntarily agree to compromise some of our beliefs in the short term, government WILL compromise our liberty for the long term.

LibertyPen.com

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Don't Confuse Wealth and Money

Many Americans believe wealth and money are the same thing. While this was somewhat true when America was on the gold standard, such is clearly no longer the case.

To illustrate the point, consider the following scenario. A hundred years ago, one of your relatives stashes $10,000 in a mattress. Now it is discovered and you are the beneficiary. While that $10,000 would have been more than enough to by a upper-scale home at the time it was put away, it now only represents enough buying power to perhaps replace a roof.

Now, consider that your relative decided to hold his wealth in gold rather than dollars, using his $10,000 to buy 500 $20 gold pieces. The value of that gold today would be worth more than a half million dollars, enough to still buy that upper-scale home today.

The reason it now takes so many more dollars to buy gold, and every other commodity for that matter, is simple. It is because of the arbitrary creation of dollars by the Federal Reserve that have no relationship to actual wealth. Since these extra dollars are counterfeit, in the sense that do not represent production, they can only serve to bid up prices. When demand goes up, without an increase in supply, the predictable result is a free market auction of sorts.

Since inception of the Federal Reserve in 1914, our money supply has increased by 500 times. In the process, the value of the dollar has decreased by about 97 percent. In each and every one of those five hundred times, the gulf between wealth and money has grown.

This devaluation of our money, the one and only cause of inflation, seems destined to continue at an increased rate, attempting to keep up with unfunded liabilities (such as $34 trillion in Medicare alone), and reckless federal spending previously unimagined (bank bailouts, stimuli, corporation takeovers, healthcare schemes, state bailouts, and other government growth). Is it any wonder China is no longer excited about investing in dollars?

Friday, June 12, 2009

Obama Job Creation

Time to size up Barack Obama's job creation rhetoric with his performance.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Milton Friedman - Educational Vouchers

Milton Friedman lays out the case for school vouchers in an easily understood and compelling manner.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Tracking American Citizens

Now, courts are beginning to allow police to attach GPS tracking devices to personal vehicles without warrants or the owner's permission. What does private property mean nowadays? Have we become so submissive and weak that are now willing slaves to whatever authority government wants to exercise against us? When it comes to lost liberty, when will enough be enough?

video

Thursday, May 7, 2009

No Prayer for Man of Hope


President Obama canceled ceremonial recognition of the national day of prayer. That is a powerful statement. One has to wonder whether he believes there is no value to prayer or is simply acknowledging that his spend-to-prosperity economic policies do not have one. Or, then again, perhaps he just figured talking to himself would be a ridiculous activity.

LibertyPen.com


video

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Souter's Evolution Toward Liberalism


When reflecting on the career of Justice Souter, the mainstream media likes to say that, over time, he evolved toward liberalism. Sure, he became more liberal, but evolved? Doesn't the word "evolved" suggest a move from worse to better?

While it is common to see judges move toward liberalism, the process is not likely one of evolution, but rather one induced by the intoxicating lure of power. Resisting that lure is what takes integrity.

The duty of judges is a technical one, that of applying the situation to existing written law. Personal politics was not supposed to enter into the equation. But, it doesn't take long for power-craving types to realize that liberalism is the proven path to despotic nirvana.

By simply "evolving toward liberalism," judges have discovered that they can essentially become dictators, deploying a living Constitution to breathe its way into unison with their own personal desires.